IF I cant do those things I simply print the audio from the synth and put on int he track notes which synth I used and which patch, simple. I like to save those patches using sysex dumps via midi into the DAW as well to save the patches. *Im a guy with hardware synths here that likes to change the patches in the DAW with the NAME of the patch showing in the DAW. Simple things like apply quantize, adjusting note lengths. Now, do the EXACT same thing with just MIDI in all Three and see which is easiest to get your head around. NOTE: There is no upgrading with Reaper, ALL the midi features are there in the full $60 version Install Cubase Elements Trial which is limited verses the Pro version which you need to buy a USB licenser to even TRY the Pro version. I dont go there anymore as the moderators suck as well and will ban you if you point out an issue.Ģ. You learn to find and use what it has to get your end result.Īs far as the forum members at Steinbug, well, Steinbug NEVER listens to its users and never fixes long standing bugs which is why everyone is pissy all the time. Reapers midi sucks too from what I hear and it hasnt stopped me at all I also use StudioOne here and its midi is supposed to suck compared to Cubase but it hasnt stopped me from doing a song here. Same with StudioOne, start with Prime then go Artist or Pro as needed I would opt for Cubase Elements then upgrade to Artist or Pro as needed. If that is the case then why spend $550 for a DAW based on midi use that you dont even know if you need or not? It depends on what your NEEDS are for midi, simple as that.Īs a Cubase user here most dont even use 10% of the functions in a said area in their DAW. I've made that choice and its Reaper all the way. You should try both and decide what's important for you. Clearly both Cubase and Reaper can produce outstanding pro-quality results and are packed with features. How do you define "best"? No one can, so all you have left is to ask yourself what works for you. "Best" (as in "best for MIDI") is a meaningless word here, subjective at best. Does it have the features you need? Do you like the interface? Can you be productive using it? Does it make you happy? Then Reaper is for you. If things in it work for you, you should use it. Is Reaper a great DAW? Yes, of course it is. Does it have the features you need? Do you like the interface? Can you be productive using it? Does it make you happy? Then Cubase is for you. Is Cubase a great DAW? Yes, of course it is. In the end, there are two things that matter. For me, after I got used to it, it worked just fine, and I can manipulate MIDI precisely how I would wish to most of the time. But I don't know why people say this it's usually (when you dig into it) because someone says that there's a MIDI thing they liked on some other software that Reaper doesn't do quite the same way. How relevant is this to MIDI? Well, I have sometimes read that Reaper's MIDI implementation can leave a bit to be desired. If you need to find that stuff, you can do a search on the actions list. But hidden in its menus are a whole bunch of clever groovy things that make music production easy. Ok, I'm not talking about instruments built in, or a sexy brand with corners on its letters. Now, the thing is, Reaper has more stuff, really. Then I discovered Reaper, and discovered that, perhaps unlike some other DAWs (like Ableton or FL Studio), Reaper is an easy leap for a Cubase user. So I was a Cubase user for years and years, and didn't even know Reaper existed. you should download and try both and make up your own mind. It's just the circle of fifths.Īnyway, that's my opinion. Very intuitive and fast.Ī lot of people talk about the chord finder like it's some kind of magical tool that will help you write music. In Reaper, all these functions are available from the mouse. In Cubase, it's three separate key strokes to insert, edit and delete MIDI notes. The simplest example to demonstrate the difference: I don't know who designed Cubase's system - but that person is not me. My method of working is the fastest for me. In Reaper I can use the radial menu to drop all sorts of chords, arpeggiate things and a whole load of stuff that I need to do. Extremely inefficient, and it feels like wearing a straight jacket compared to Reaper. I think the people who say this basically grew up with Cubase so have internalized that as the 'right' way to do stuff.įrom my perspective, Cubase's MIDI was average at best.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |